News

Kerry subpoenaed again over Benghazi

Kerry subpoenaed again over Benghazi

SUBPOENAED:House of Representatives Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Darrell Issa had earlier issued a subpoena for Kerry to appear on May 21, but lifted that request after the State Department said it would conflict with Kerry's travel schedule. The subpoena issued on Thursday would require him to appear on May 29. Photo: Reuters

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – A U.S. Republican lawmaker on Thursday issued a second subpoena for Secretary of State John Kerry to testify before Congress this month about the 2012 attacks on U.S. facilities in Benghazi in which four Americans were killed.

The State Department reacted angrily, saying it was the second time Kerry had been subpoenaed while on foreign travel, and noted the announcement had been made via Twitter. “This is not the way legitimate and responsible oversight is conducted,” said State Department spokeswoman Marie Harf.

House of Representatives Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Darrell Issa had earlier issued a subpoena for Kerry to appear on May 21, but lifted that request after the State Department said it would conflict with Kerry’s travel schedule. The subpoena issued on Thursday would require him to appear on May 29.

“Absent an assertion of executive privilege, the State Department has a legal obligation to fully and completely comply,” Issa said in a statement.

However, Harf’s statement indicated the State Department was not keen on the idea. “We will continue to work with the committee to resolve their request, but we have not made arrangements for a hearing date, and we hope to explore with them whether there are witnesses better suited to answer their questions and meet their needs for oversight,” Harf said.

Democrats said the subpoena called into question the Republicans’ announcement earlier this month of a select committee on Benghazi. It is supposed to bring together the earlier probes by other committees, including Issa’s, into one place. Issa was not named to the select panel, which will be led by Republican Representative Trey Gowdy.

“The Select Committee is a sign of no confidence in Issa, just as Issa’s action today is a sign of a lack of confidence in the Select Committee,” Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi said in a statement.

The Democrats have not decided whether to take part in the select committee to investigate the September 11, 2012, attacks by militants on U.S. facilities in Benghazi that left U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens and three others dead.

Issa has said he wants Kerry to answer questions about the State Department’s response to the investigation, although Kerry was not secretary of state at the time the Benghazi attacks happened; Hillary Clinton was still in charge. She has testified to two committees of Congress about the attacks, but not Issa’s.

Republicans accuse the White House of creating a political smokescreen in the aftermath of Benghazi to protect President Barack Obama’s 2012 re-election. Democrats accuse Republicans of trying to get political advantage in a congressional election year, and of trying to harm Hillary Clinton’s chances of running for president in 2016.

(Reporting by Susan Cornwell; Editing by Eric Walsh)

Recent Headlines

in Entertainment, Weird

New Jersey Christmas tree controlled by tweets

treetweet

Twitter users anywhere in the world can control the lights on this holiday display.

in Entertainment

Leaked Sony emails reveal Idris Elba in line for ‘Bond’

idriselba

A leaked Sony email named British actor Idris Elba as the frontrunner to replace Daniel Craig as James Bond.

in Music

Kelly Clarkson pulls off star-studded Christmas concert in 85 days

clarkson

The first-ever Miracle on Broadway event raised over $400,000 for Tennessee-area charities.

in Entertainment

Sarah Jessica Parker eyes return to small screen

sarahjessicaparker

The "Sex and the City" star could be heading back to HBO.

in Entertainment, National

Obama: Sony hack not an act of war

interview

President Barack Obama says the massive hacking was not an act of war but instead was cyber-vandalism.